The Philosophical Justification of the Barrett Campaign
October 10, 2010 | Permalink
You let him off easy by only using two blocks, though stopping at only four might have been even harder.
"He's NOT the next Jim Doyle" -> ...but... ->
"He's the only candidate who has pledged to preserve and expand Jim Doyle's policies"...
Posted by: J. Gravelle | Oct 10, 2010 9:58:22 PM
He's no Gableman.
Posted by: John Foust | Oct 11, 2010 10:17:46 AM